Re: [RFC] Use GitLab Milestones

[Jonas Hahnfeld]

Am Freitag, den 26.06.2020, 11:35 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.06.2020, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2020, 20:54 +0200 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
> > > Le 23/06/2020 à 17:50, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
> > > > Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2020, 15:54 +0200 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
> > > > > - How do you plan to indicate backports? (Granted, this is a very
> > > > > limited subset.)
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, that's the question for the 277 issues with at least two labels.
> > > > I'd argue that we're interested in the first released version. So maybe
> > > > just removing the unstable release?
> > > 
> > > Sounds reasonable. That was Trevor's opinion too, if I remember well
> > > (I don't have time to search the archives, though, but I recall it has
> > > been discussed already).
> > 
> > Yes, see:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2020-05/msg00323.html
> > 
> > 
> > Actually, it might be a good idea to deal with these issues before
> > running the script, so all (initial) milestones can be assigned
> > automatically. Ok for everyone?
> 
> I'll start working on these issues from the top (see list). If you want
> to help, maybe start at the bottom or somewhere in the middle.

I got the list down to five corner cases, all involving multiple
commits related to a single issue.

https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/154
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1861
These two issues saw additional fixes after several years.

https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/3807
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/4062
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/5039
Similar, but just multiple patches spread over subsequent releases.

I think it would be sufficient to have the final release that included
all commits, but wanted to check back if everybody agrees on that.

Jonas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part