[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Access request to push to translation
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: Access request to push to translation |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:32:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 |
On 21/6/20 15:02, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
I don't understand why you want
to make your lifes harder than before the switch and merge everything
to master immediately?
Do we? That's not my understanding.
Rather, what one translator suggested, namely:
- forking the repo
- Creating another working branch
- Issuing a MR from this branch, against translation branch
- waiting for a) the MR to be merged, then b) translation branch to
be merged onto master
is not exactly 'ideal'. Translation branch is a safe net, now MR are a
safe net. I thougth (wrongly) that use of MR was a substitute for the
very existence of the translation branch itself.
--
Francisco Vila, Ph.D. - Badajoz (Spain)
paconet.org , lilypond.es
- Access request to push to translation, Francisco Vila, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Francisco Vila, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Francisco Vila, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/21
- Re: Access request to push to translation,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: Access request to push to translation, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/21