[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@h
|
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
|
Subject: |
Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 May 2020 00:53:47 +0200 |
On 5/6/20, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> In case you're interested how I found out about this:
> https://www.hahnjo.de/blog/2020/05/06/recursively-timeing-processes.html
Good to know, thanks! (And the resulting improvement is indeed impressive.)
Cheers,
-- V.
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), (continued)
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/06
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden),
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/09