[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: translation updates in master
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: translation updates in master |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Mar 2020 20:41:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.4 |
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2020, 20:32 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld <
> address@hidden
> > writes:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2020, 17:50 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > > Jonas Hahnfeld <
> > > address@hidden
> > >
> > > > writes:
> > > > Perfect. I only restored the following files from the branch to keep
> > > > the Portuguese translation:
> > > > * Documentation/web/server/lilypond.org.htaccess
> > > > * ROADMAP
> > > > * python/langdefs.py
> > >
> > > Ouch. Yes, I had assumed that everything important would be in
> > > Documentation/??/ and I at least discovered on my own that I had
> > > overlooked Documentation/pictures/ . But not the rest. I also had
> > > conflicts in config.hh.in aclocal.in and some Makefile. Could also be
> > > related to Portuguese or something.
> >
> > Well, my heuristic of "all commits that touch Documentation/pt" did not
> > catch all changes either: I've additionally picked
> > > e47faac609 Doc: get rid of "translation missing for" [pt]
> >
> > to silence the warnings.
> >
> > PTAL and let me know if I should push to staging.
>
> Well, your version is better than mine on translation though I am not
> sure it is perfect (it's just hard to be sure). I'd rather you'd
> replace the branch on translation to reduce the possibility of it
> getting reintroduced (which would ruin the effort). And a few days
> later we merge into staging.
>
> Should we discover other problems, we can fix them in translation first.
>
> Does that sound reasonable?
Ok. So to double check I'll do
$ git push origin :dev/translation-merge :dev/translation-picking
:dev/translation-picking-merge :translation
$ git push origin HEAD:translation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, (continued)
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/03/03
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, David Kastrup, 2020/03/03
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, David Kastrup, 2020/03/03
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/03/03
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, David Kastrup, 2020/03/03
- translation updates in master (was: Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/03/03
- Re: translation updates in master, David Kastrup, 2020/03/03
- Re: translation updates in master,
Jonas Hahnfeld <=
- Re: translation updates in master, David Kastrup, 2020/03/03
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, David Kastrup, 2020/03/02
- Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?, David Kastrup, 2020/03/02