Re: 2.21.0 release plans and considerations

[David Kastrup]

Jonas Hahnfeld <address@hidden> writes:

> Sure, the solution is to apply #5799. Turns out the solution is not
> only for x86_64-w64-mingw32 but also for 32 bit mingw that GUB
> uses. So I'm arguing that it should go in before 2.21.0 is cut.

Well, the rationale for being conservative with new patches is so that
we can figure out at some later point of time what might have caused a
difference in workability.

Seems like we know this for this patch now.

-- 
David Kastrup
My replies have a tendency to cause friction.  To help mitigating
damage, feel free to forward problematic posts to me adding a subject
like "timeout 1d" (for a suggested timeout of 1 day) or "offensive".