[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 56940
|
From: |
dak |
|
Subject: |
Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:29:15 -0800 |
On 2020/02/22 23:18:43, hanwenn wrote:
> On 2020/02/22 23:17:50, hanwenn wrote:
> > you were already potentially in a state where you have 3 jobs each
spawning 3
> > lp-book invocations,
>
> whoops, I mean: 3 lp-book invocations spawning 3 lilypond subprocesses
each, for
> 9 in total.
Considering that I build with CPU_COUNT=9 make -j9 I am pretty sure that
I'd have noticed if that were happening so far. I may have a nice
number of cores (4) and memory considered plentiful (16GB) for a laptop,
but 81 parallel instances of LilyPond would certainly bring this system
to its knees.
https://codereview.appspot.com/569400043/
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/22
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/02/22
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/22
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/22
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/22
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden),
dak <=
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/02/22
- Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/23