[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers? (was:
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers? (was: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation, also Germans?) |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 19:25:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Federico Bruni <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Il giorno lun 17 feb 2020 alle 22:49, Federico Bruni
>> <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>
>>> I'm working on the italian update and I hope to be ready before
>>> Thursday night.
>>>
>>
>> Can we have one day delay? So deadline to push to translation branch
>> by Friday night?
>> I guess I won't have enough time to complete the update but at least I
>> can use some spare time tomorrow to get close to the goal.
>
> There was no fixed deadline. My goal was "this weekend", but if that
> makes things ugly, there is no point in not delaying some more days
> after the years we spent on this.
>
> In unrelated news, I tried my hand at translating at least the Changes
> file into German and am about 50% done. Anybody want to work from the
> bottom so that we should coordinate in order to avoid duplicate effort?
> I got kind of a headache so far. Hats off to people who tackle a whole
> translation rather than just a puny file.
German Changes file has been added by now. Where are we with regard to
the other translations? Federico?
The plan for afterwards would generally be that we
merge/move/cherrypick/whatever translations into master without
introducing unintended regressions. I may try doing that as I am
probably most at fault for the long 2.19.80+ phase. For changes to doc
and translation afterwards, it will make sense to check individually
whether they can/should also go by cherry-picking into the stable branch
for the sake of possible 2.20 followup releases. The main criterion
obviously being whether they refer to functionality actually present in
2.20.
So there is a bit of leeway for improvements in the 2.20 documentation
even after the 2.20.0 line.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: 2.20 and 2.21 release plans, (continued)
Re: [translations] 2.20 and 2.21 release plans, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/02/17
- Re: [translations] 2.20 and 2.21 release plans, David Kastrup, 2020/02/17
- Message not available
- Re: [translations] 2.20 and 2.21 release plans, Federico Bruni, 2020/02/20
- 2.20.0 release coordination with translation, also Germans? (was: [translations] 2.20 and 2.21 release plans), David Kastrup, 2020/02/20
- Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation, also Germans? (was: [translations] 2.20 and 2.21 release plans), Federico Bruni, 2020/02/20
- Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation, also Germans?, David Kastrup, 2020/02/20
- Re: [translations] Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation, also Germans?, Federico Bruni, 2020/02/20
2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers? (was: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation, also Germans?),
David Kastrup <=
Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers? (was: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation, also Germans?), Federico Bruni, 2020/02/22
Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers?, David Kastrup, 2020/02/22
Re: [translations] Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers?, Federico Bruni, 2020/02/22
Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers?, Phil Holmes, 2020/02/23
Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers?, David Kastrup, 2020/02/23
Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers?, Phil Holmes, 2020/02/23
Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers?, David Kastrup, 2020/02/23
Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers?, Francisco Vila, 2020/02/23
Re: 2.20 and 2.21 release plans, Urs Liska, 2020/02/17