[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staging broken.
From: |
Lukas-Fabian Moser |
Subject: |
Re: Staging broken. |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:33:22 +0100 |
Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 09:08, David Kastrup <address@hidden> a écrit :
Color me curious: why would you try building staging? The whole point
> of the staging system was to avoid breakage for developers. Only patchy
> processes are supposed to care about staging.
>
Master didn't compile, and I tried staging next. But I see now that this
doesn't make much sense as staging is more likely to break.
I don't remember what exactly kept Master from compiling yesterday - when I
tried later it worked. But anyway, my stupid procedure enabled me to
confirm that Staging broke with the same error that you encountered.
By the way: does it make sense to compile and use the stable/2.20 branch
for my everyday work (beta testing, so to speak)?
Lukas
>
- Re: Staging broken., (continued)
- Re: Staging broken., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/02/19
- Re: Staging broken., David Kastrup, 2020/02/19
- Re: Staging broken., David Kastrup, 2020/02/19
- Re: Staging broken., Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/02/20
- Re: Staging broken., David Kastrup, 2020/02/20
- Re: Staging broken., Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/02/20
- Re: Staging broken., David Kastrup, 2020/02/20
- Re: Staging broken., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/02/20
- Re: Staging broken., Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2020/02/19
- Re: Staging broken., David Kastrup, 2020/02/19
- Re: Staging broken.,
Lukas-Fabian Moser <=
- Re: Staging broken., David Kastrup, 2020/02/19