[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc" |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 2020 20:13:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Jean-Charles Malahieude <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Le 30/01/2020 à 19:08, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>>> Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:39, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain from
>>>>>> cherry-picking further material: the last version of the branch I
>>>>>> checked was from early December and it failed in the same manner.
>>>>>> Compilation of CPU_COUNT=9 make -j9 doc ends with
>>>>>
>>>>> […]
>>>> Thanks. It is sort of annoying that it occurs right at the end of
>>>> the
>>>> (comparatively expensive) doc build, but at least then it is reproduced
>>>> with another "make doc" within several seconds. So there may be a way
>>>> of getting an extensive log just for that final phase of mass-linking
>>>> the offsite-root .
>>>>
>>>
>>> I just had a successful mage -j5 doc as of commit
>>> 8a05312fd8d2a56ec724a793b313949db0cfe729
>>
>> Current stable/2.20 which failed on my system.
>>
>>> It took about half an hour, and I don't know if it matters, but I
>>> build in the root directory.
>>
>> As do I. I just tried
>>
>> PYTHONVERBOSE=2
>> PYTHONPATH=/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/out:`pwd`/python/auxiliar
>> /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/www_post LilyPond 2.19.84
>> ./out-www offline 2>&1 | tee /tmp/dump
>>
>> and that leaves me with
>>
>> # trying /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/out/postprocess_htmlmodule.so
>> # trying /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/out/postprocess_html.py
>> # trying /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/out/postprocess_html.pyc
>> # trying
>> /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.x86_64-linux-gnu.so
>> # trying /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.so
>> # trying /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/auxiliar/postprocess_htmlmodule.so
>> # trying /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
>> # /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.pyc matches
>> /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
>> import postprocess_html # precompiled from
>> /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.pyc
>> import time # builtin
>> Mirroring...
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/www_post", line 101, in
>> <module>
>> os.symlink (p, dest)
>> OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
>> # clear __builtin__._
>> # clear sys.path
>> # clear sys.argv
>> # clear sys.ps1
>> # clear sys.ps2
>>
>> in the central portion. Which does not appear to help at all. Any idea
>> what I could/should do to figure out where stuff goes wrong with my
>> system? One thing I could do is check with current master.
>
> Oops.
>
> dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ git checkout origin
> error: The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by
> checkout:
> Documentation/snippets/non-traditional.snippet-list
> Please move or remove them before you switch branches.
> Aborting
>
> That sounds suspicious. Probably created by a makelsr call of mine but
> did not make it into version control. I'll check what is up with that:
> it may be that this is what caused the problem.
Nope. Removing that category from the original snippet and removing the
file still leaves me with a failing doc build at the same stage. I'll
reconfigure to make sure, but I doubt this is it.
--
David Kastrup
- stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", Dan Eble, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc",
David Kastrup <=
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", Dan Eble, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", Dan Eble, 2020/01/30
- Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc", David Kastrup, 2020/01/30