[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Undocumented "ambitusAfter"

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Undocumented "ambitusAfter"
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 13:28:23 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:

> Am Sa., 18. Mai 2019 um 11:09 Uhr schrieb Malte Meyn <address@hidden>:
>> Am 10.05.19 um 22:42 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> > Malte, do you've time to add a doc-string?
>> I didn’t realize that the doc-string is used for documentation
>> generation also for music functions. Thanks for the hint!
> Not sure how `make doc´ does things.
> But while working on #5518 I generated IR by doing
> lilypond
> This returns a file internals.texi
> Then
> texi2html internals.texi
> returning
> internals.html
> A plethora of warnings are displayed, though it's a _lot_ faster
> compared to `make doc´, even if restricted to build IR only.
> Actually, music-functions are not printed in internals.html.
> Though, obviously they are processed.
> Probably one could have them integrated in IR, if wished, but I didn't
> research in this direction.

They are in an appendix of NR.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]