[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Charles Winston's chord-semantics GSOC work
|
From: |
Dan Eble |
|
Subject: |
Re: Charles Winston's chord-semantics GSOC work |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:11:54 -0400 |
On Apr 9, 2019, at 10:43, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> majorSevenSymbol, but since it can be set, in can be unset. And if it is
> unset, we should not produce nothing, because then c:7+ will display as C7,
> which is the same as c:7. I don't think the display needs to be sensible,
> but it needs to be something different from C7.
>
> I value your input and I'd like to do something that is recognizable as
> insane in response to insane input.
Insanity sounds like a job for emoji!
But seriously, it would be unreasonable to demand that you do more in this
patch than match the legacy behavior in this case. If it can be improved at
all, it can be improved separately.
Regards,
—
Dan