[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 21:23:43 +0100 |
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 21:16, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> On 14 Mar 2019, at 19:32, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sigh. This discussion stated that they aren't distributing the
>>> documentation. Of course distributing the PDF without corresponding
>>> source code would not be appropriate,
>>
>> Please explain.
>
> I don't see that anything I say makes any sense to you, and vice versa.
> The whole point of the GPL is that any generated/compiled stuff has to
> be accompanied by its source code.
That is not what the paragraph say, and be provided independently on any of
those forms.
>>> ...but so far I haven't read anything
>>> that doesn't instead suggest that they are distributing the source code
>>> of the PDF without distributing the PDF because they have not met the
>>> dependencies for building the PDF.
>>
>> That could possibly be done too.
>>
>>> Which is the complete opposite.
>>
>> But including the PDF would be more appropriate.
>
> It would be more desirable. The GPL does not demand it. As long as you
> don't deliver the documentation in compiled form, it's your choice
> whether you make the source available or not.
Just make it available in any of those forms.
>>>> MacPorts admits making an independent binary installer from the
>>>> distribution and one can choose what dependencies should be
>>>> included, and also its install location.
>>>
>>> Which has absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with the topic of
>>> including the documentation. Or access to the source code.
>>
>> Why do you think so?
>
> What does the install location have to do with including documentation
> or access to the source code?
The stuff is merged, so you can have different installers if you so like.
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, (continued)
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, David Kastrup, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Hans Åberg, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, David Kastrup, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Hans Åberg, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, David Kastrup, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Hans Åberg, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, David Kastrup, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Hans Åberg, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, David Kastrup, 2019/03/14
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, David Kastrup, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Karlin High, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Hans Åberg, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, David Kastrup, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Karlin High, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Karlin High, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Hans Åberg, 2019/03/15
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Jacques Menu, 2019/03/08
- Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?, Hans Åberg, 2019/03/08