|
From: | Knut Petersen |
Subject: | Re: Please test gub |
Date: | Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:31:07 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 06.02.19 15:09, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
That leaves the two problems of - LLVMgold.so in /usr/lib/bfd-plugins shadowing liblto_plugin.so (I rm'ed LLVMgold.so there for the purpose of the above gub run.)This is definitely *not* a gub issue. It's strange that only the compilation of guile is affected by the problem, but I consider this a pure coincidence. IOW, this should be added to the gub documentation, as a special preparation step for some LLVM/binutils combinations.
I agree.
- the need to make sure that `python` calls a python2 interpreter.No idea how this could be solved elegantly. I guess it can't, so we have again something to document...
Use /usr/bin/env python2? Does every python 2.x installation really contain a python2 executable? I think we also would need to change some lilypond files ... Knut
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |