Re: logging an optional input location

[Dan Eble]

On May 12, 2018, at 16:17, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Does our code base use the optional second parameter anywhere?  If not, maybe 
> it would be even simpler to eliminate the optional second parameter, and just 
> call
> 
>      warning (_f (. . .), origin);
> 
> and keep all the testing for a null pointer in the warning function.

Carl,

I’m pretty confident I can enable that syntax, though there is a chance the 
implementation will be perceived as too clever; but since you mention it, I’ll 
give it a try and see how it turns out.

Thanks,
— 
Dan