[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regtests for previous stables failing
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: regtests for previous stables failing |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:06:48 +0100 (BST) |
Hello
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:43:07 +0200, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 2017-10-27 13:19 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> >
> >> Maybe make check and/or test-baseline doesn't like a separate build
> >> directory? That's the only thing I can think of right now.
> >
> > Ok, will try later, have to leave soon.
> > Though, I never experienced the problem with more up to date
> > branches/master in a build-directory.
>
> Wait, patchy worked with a separate build.
>
> In that case, I can only think of our Makefiles not being compatible
> with current make (there are also problems with current g++ but you
> should not even have gotten as far had you encountered those).
address@hidden ~ $ make --version && gcc --version
GNU Make 4.1
Built for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Copyright (C) 1988-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Licence GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.5) 5.4.0 20160609
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
James
- regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/26
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, David Kastrup, 2017/10/26
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/26
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, David Kastrup, 2017/10/27
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/27
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, David Kastrup, 2017/10/27
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/27
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, David Kastrup, 2017/10/27
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing,
James Lowe <=
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/27
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, David Kastrup, 2017/10/27
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/28
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, David Kastrup, 2017/10/28
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/28
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, David Kastrup, 2017/10/28
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/28
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/10/29
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/30
- Re: regtests for previous stables failing, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/10/27