Re: [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 3960 discussion

[Trevor Daniels]

James wrote: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 11:54 AM

>- **status**: Started --> Invalid
> - **Patch**: needs_work -->  
> - **Comment**:
> 
> Revisiting this, the example given at the start of this issue
> 
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/explicit-breaks
> 
> has no corresponding entry at all in the 2.19 documentation. In fact the 
> entire NR 4.x section is completely different.
> 
> The example in the 2.18 is for overriding when LilyPond doesn't honour a 
> manual `\break` or `\pagebreak` command by using 
> `NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission` overrides. The 2.19 doc doesn't 
> mention any example or even snippet. It does have one mention about 
> `line-break-permission` but only in the context of what the setting does and 
> what its defaults are.

This section was changed significantly in Oct 2014when the various 
\auto..breaks.. commands were installed.  See

https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4169/
 
> So I wonder now if this tracker is still needed.

so marking this invalid is correct.
 
Trevor


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com