Re: Implement make-bow-stencil, make-tie-stencil for use in markup-commands undertie and overtie (issue 270640043 by address@hidden)

[thomasmorley65]

On 2015/11/19 21:29:41, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> On 2015/11/18 23:01:20, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> > On 2015/11/16 15:57:49, dak wrote:

> > > If we are sure we'll never need to change the direction based on
the
> > > markup direction (like, say, over/under actual note glyphs?), I'd
just
> > implement
> > > commands undertie/overtie that call some internal function with
the
> direction
> > to
> > > use directly.
> >
> > Done this way. Right now I can't imagine any use-case for relying on
> > direction-modifiers.
> > If there is use for it sometime in the future we may change this
again,
> > ofcourse.
> >
> > >
> > > If there may be a use case for inheriting direction, some
directable markup
> > > command may be useful.  Either it is called (with an appropriate
explicit
> > > direction override) by undertie/overtie, or all three call the
same internal
> > > function.

> Changed my mind, because I found a not uncommon use-case for a
tie-command
> relying on direction-modifiers and \voiceXxx:

> m = {
>    c''1 \prall -\tweak text \markup \tie "131" -1
> }

> { \voiceOne \m \voiceTwo \m }

see png on the tracker
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3088/?page=2


> This is used in scores for guitar quite often and I seem to remember
having seen
> similiar in piano-scores indicating silent finger changes.

> @James
> sorry for the additional work



https://codereview.appspot.com/270640043/