lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patchy email


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Patchy email
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:19:17 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

James <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On 17/11/15 15:46, address@hidden wrote:
>> 15:37:38 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at    
>> 84ac019c437ea40b7b18ab46da1772f6db344a83
>> 15:37:42 Merged staging, now at:     84ac019c437ea40b7b18ab46da1772f6db344a83
>> 15:37:43     Success:                ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
>> 15:38:01     Success:                /tmp/lilypond-autobuild/configure 
>> --enable-checking
>> 15:38:05     Success:                nice make clean
>> 15:46:06 *** FAILED BUILD ***
>>      nice make -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
>>      Previous good commit:   95b22392ab6ee4bdfd23906eb796e907185a1c20
>>      Current broken commit:  84ac019c437ea40b7b18ab46da1772f6db344a83
>> 15:46:06 *** FAILED STEP ***
>>      merge from staging
>>      Failed runner: nice make -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
>> See the log file log-staging-nice-make--j3-CPU_COUNT=3.txt
>> 15:46:06 Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File 
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
>> line 528, in handle_staging
>>     self.build (issue_id=issue_id)
>>   File 
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
>> line 316, in build
>>     issue_id)
>>   File 
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
>> line 266, in runner
>>     raise FailedCommand ("Failed runner: %s\nSee the log file %s" % 
>> (command, this_logfilename))
>> FailedCommand: Failed runner: nice make -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
>> See the log file log-staging-nice-make--j3-CPU_COUNT=3.txt
>>
>>
> I saw you were running this so ran my own patchy, and it pushed OK.
>
> Hopefully yours is OK too?

Nope.  It fails at the link stage because of something like "image too
large".  But only patchy, not my regular compilation.  Maybe it's
--enable-checking or something that makes the difference, no idea.  Need
to experiment some more.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]