[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Music glyph design choices
From: |
tisimst |
Subject: |
Re: Music glyph design choices |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:45:21 -0700 (MST) |
On Sunday, August 9, 2015, Phil Holmes-2 [via Lilypond] <
address@hidden> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tisimst" <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=179401&i=0>>
> To: <[hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=179401&i=1>>
>
> Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2015 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Music glyph design choices
>
>
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG [via Lilypond] <
> > [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=179401&i=2>>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > 1. accidentals.flatflat: Why is the left flat more compressed than
> >> > the right? Perhaps if the left were expanded slightly and the right
> >> > were compressed slightly, then the glyph width wouldn't have to
> >> > change, but would look more consistent.
> >>
> >> Hmm. I don't think this glyph looks inconsistent...
> >>
> >
> > Here's what I meant. In the following image, we see two normal flats
> > superimposed (in green) on top of the doubleflat glyph (in black). The
> > stems are matched up to show what I'm referring to as being
> inconsistent:
> >
> > [image: Inline image 1]
> >
> > I hope this makes it more obvious what I'm seeing. The "left" flat is
> much
> > more compressed than the "right" one in the doubleflat. That's all I'm
> > saying. It would seem better to me to at least have the the left counter
> > look more like the right one. Like I said before, I'm not saying it is
> > inherently wrong (nor the green version "right"), but it seems like the
> > two
> > sides to the glyph could look more similar. Maybe I'm the only one who
> > notices this.
>
> I don't have double flat examples from real music, but can show what
> Sibelius, Bravura, and Elaine Gould offer. These are similar to your
> suggestion. It would be interesting to try to find some real-world
> examples
> from published scores.
>
> Gould also says: "double flat: two flat signs are placed together and
> (usually) touching". This also implies they should be similar or the same.
>
I agree with Gould, but I would follow what she says more than what she
shows in the book since she uses Sibelius' default Opus font for all the
music instead of real engraving punches.
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Music-glyph-design-choices-tp179329p179403.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Music glyph design choices, tisimst, 2015/08/07
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/08
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2015/08/08
- Re: Music glyph design choices, tisimst, 2015/08/09
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, tisimst, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Abraham Lee, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Phil Holmes, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, tisimst, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/11
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/11