Issue 4002: Mention backslash escaping in Scheme. (issue 112040043 by address@hidden)

[dak]

https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode950
Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:950:
@address@hidden@@address@hidden@address@hidden@tie{}command}).  However, if a
Why write @bs{} instead of \ here?

https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode951
Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:951: Texinfo string is within a
block of Scheme code, it must be
That's incorrect.  Correct would be:
However, within double-quoted Scheme and/or LilyPond strings,
backslashes (including those ending up in Texinfo markup) need to be
escaped by doubling them.

There is no such thing as a "Texinfo string", and it is not contained in
"Scheme code" but rather in strings.

https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode955
Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:955: "The
@@address@hidden@address@hidden@} command..."
That's awfully unreadable source code.  I'd be tempted to use @verbatim
instead in order to avoid all the Texinfo escapes.  Also there is no
point in writing @address@hidden instead of \\ here.

https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/