Re: Doc: NR Pitches.itely - added 2 new snippets (issue 110240044 by address@hidden)

[Keith OHara]

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:40:17 -0700, <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Is it worth making the Notation Reference longer?
>
> What do you suggest?

Depending on your opinion about the NR length, maybe leaving these examples in 
lsr only.

> https://codereview.appspot.com/110240044/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode1325
> Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:1325: \override
> Staff.KeySignature.flat-positions = #'((-5 . 5))
> On 2014/06/29 03:17:00, Keith wrote:
> > This already shows how to print key signatures over a different or
> wider range
> > of the staff.  You might consider this good enough.
>
> I don't understand what you mean. Good enough compared to what?

Good enough alone, without the creating-custom-key-signatures.ly snippet.
The double-clef would fit in tweaking-clef-properties.ly

Or, the double-clef might be a better example for \translate in appendix A.10.2
\markup {
   \combine
     \musicglyph #"clefs.C"
     \translate #'(2.5 . 2) \musicglyph #"clefs.G"
}

If you don't mind the NR length, this all looks good as it is.