Re: Automated engraving benchmarks

[Urs Liska]

Am 01.03.2014 11:41, schrieb James:
> On 01/03/14 10:35, Urs Liska wrote:
> > What do you think, where should such a set go? Of course it would be
> > easier to maintain it in a separate Git repository, hosted anywhere.
> > But I think it should be part of lilypond.org, which would
> > additionally add it to make doc.
>
> We already have a location for those 'example' scores that appear on the
> website
>
> ../Documentation/ly-examples/..

Sounds reasonable.

> See:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=0883ccf0f0d409365a9cc99bd2e62655f3ffd9be
>
>
> For example. Why not use that?
> http://lilypond.org/examples.html
>
> Although why not just expand on that - although the point of that part
> of the website is to show off LilyPond. How is what you want to do here
> any different?

What I want is _not_ to show off LilyPond, but to provide material to 
seriously judge what is still lacking, and to see the development.
Something similar to the regtests, but on a different level.
That's why I wouldn't want to put it on lilypond.org/examples.html, or 
better not at all in the "Introduction" showcase.

Urs

> James