Re: more comments (issue 13051044)

[janek . lilypond]

https://codereview.appspot.com/13051044/diff/1/flower/include/std-string.hh
File flower/include/std-string.hh (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/13051044/diff/1/flower/include/std-string.hh#newcode40
flower/include/std-string.hh:40: typedef size_t ssize; ///< I believe it
is in some c... header.
On 2013/08/20 10:58:03, fred1995 wrote:
> > Indeed, this looks messy.  in addition to these two, there's
ssize_t.
> > I think that using just size_t is what we should do.

> No: ssize_t is the signed version of size_t used for file streams. It
is
> important that is remains signed. I looked at it and saw that it is
used because
> we use the C FILE for i/o which we shouldn't use in C++. The
equivalent in
> standard C++ is streamsize.

ok, i see now.  So, ssize_t should remain, but renaming size_t
to ssize doesn't make any sense.

Janek

https://codereview.appspot.com/13051044/