[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Excludes grobs supported by cross-staff grobs from pure-relevant cal
|
From: |
mike |
|
Subject: |
Re: Excludes grobs supported by cross-staff grobs from pure-relevant calculations (issue 12857043) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:37:00 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/side-position-interface.cc
File lily/side-position-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/side-position-interface.cc#newcode283
lily/side-position-interface.cc:283: && cross_staff
On 2013/08/14 05:34:18, Keith wrote:
Under these conditions,
trying to estimate before line-breaking (pure)
where an object 'me' will align vertically (Y_AXIS)
against an object 'e' whose position depends on staff-spacing
(cross-staff)
we might want to skip this object 'e', whether 'e' is a stem or not.
If it is a stem, since we know it is cross-staff, is the test on the
next line
of the stem's direction going to be reliable ? It seems best to skip
the stem
and estimate the alignment against the remaining objects in 'support'.
Great ideas - I like this better. Will do.
https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/