[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (iss
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075) |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:07:19 +0200 |
On 16 févr. 2013, at 21:20, address@hidden wrote:
> Best, of course, would be to find and repair the code that cannot handle
> zero-widths. We do not yet have the choice between "a bit better" and
> "best", merely "a bit better" or nothing.
>
One solution is to just allow 0-width buildings and then propose a bug fix
whenever numerical inaccuracies actually creep in.
In this case, we'd change the comment to something like "be attentive to
0-width buildings, as they may cause numerical errors."
What would help, of course, is if the comment told what these errors could look
like.
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/02/09
- Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075), mtsolo, 2013/02/10
- Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075), dak, 2013/02/16
- Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/02/16
- Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075),
address@hidden <=
- Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075), dak, 2013/02/22
- Re: Standardizes use of empty extents in pure heights and skylines. (issue 7310075), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/02/27