[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting pa
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:02:09 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Trevor Bača <trevorbaca <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Did VerticalAxisGroup's default-staff-staff-spacing property stop
> respecting the 'padding' attribute between 2.17.9 and 2.17.10?
>
> I ask because I use a custom time signature context in my scores.
No, padding still works. The latest LilyPond misunderstood what you
want with the zero-dimension TimeSignature.
> \override TimeSignature #'X-extent = #'(0 . 0)
> \override TimeSignature #'Y-extent = #'(0 . 0)
If can give it some with, the spacing works as I would expect
\override TimeSignature #'X-extent = #'(0 . 1)
I remember a comment somewhere in the recent code changes about zero-size
stencils "messing up" spacing, possibly alongside code to explicitly ignore
them, but I can't find it now. It might help if you can say why you wanted
the time signatures to have, conceptually, zero extents.
- Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Trevor Bača, 2013/02/07
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?,
Keith OHara <=
- Message not available
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Keith OHara, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Trevor Bača, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Xavier Scheuer, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08