Hi Janek,
Am 08.11.2012 09:22, schrieb address@hidden:
Marc,
again i have some objections on wording. Let me assure you that i don't
intend to pick on you!
:-)
Your patches receive so much of my attention
because
(a) i understand them (not always the case with David's patches for
example)
(b) they're usually just the correct size to make a good review.
thanks for your work! :)
PS i dedicate all my code reviews to Graham Percival, especially the
documentation ones.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6830043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6830043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode1156
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:1156: Optional octavation can be
obtained by enclosing the numeric
I don't quite understand this "optional" thing. (maybe i don't
understand this notation correctly at all?)
I suppose that a parenthesized clef octavation doesn't mean that the
octavation is optional (that is, it doesn't mean "you may choose to play
it in this octave or another, whatever pleases you most"). I suppose
that a parenthesized clef octavation means that it's just a reminder, or
that the octavation number is editorial.
I used them in my pieces before in exactly the way you describe above.
For a flute, I used \clef "G^(8)"