[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: easier \noBeam syntax
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: easier \noBeam syntax |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:28:14 +0100 |
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:10 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Joram Berger <address@hidden> writes:
>> It's no real problem, just wanted to mention it. The idea came up while
>> making a cheat sheet and realizing, that [ and ] have no equally short
>> counterpart.
>
> So the main use case would seem to be a prettier cheat sheet. Wasting
> symbols or tokens on that seems excessive.
lol :)
I think that \noBeam isn't used often enough to justify a shorter
syntax. Additionally, in my opinion it's better to have non-symbollic
names for commands that make something disappear.
Janek