[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:14:19 +0100 |
On 5 nov. 2012, at 10:11, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would
>>> it be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just
>>> let the code for rest height in general return the height of the
>>> standard rest glyph without bothering to check the on-staffiness?
>
> I don't understand. A 64th rest glyph certainly has a larger height
> than a glyph for the whole rest.
No, we're talking about the height of something like rests.1 compared to
rests.1o in the Feta font.
>
>> I wanna say that they do (it'd be a difference of half a ledger
>> line) but I could be wrong. I know nothing about metafont - someone
>> more competent than I would have to check.
>
> It seems that you mean something special if you talk about `height'...
>
The question is if these two glyphs have a different Y-extent (rests.1 versus
rests.1o).
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, (continued)
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision,
address@hidden <=
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, Keith OHara, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/06
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, Keith OHara, 2012/11/07
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/07