[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:14:44 +0200 (CEST) |
>>>> \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] }
>
> The original intent was for duplicate requests in most of these
> cases to be ignored, so you could combine multiple identifiers into
> chords, eg.
>
> vOne = { c8[ d] }
> vTwo = { e8[ f] }
>
> forScore = \new Voice {
> << \vOne \vTwo >>
> }
>
> without this affecting the typesetting.
Interesting. I'm hearing this the first time. It seems completely
undocumented (or rather unspecified).
> I would advise against overloading the meaning of existing
> constructs, as it will have compatiblility implications.
My suggestion a few hours ago was to overload this only within the
\beaming, but the last word have you and David :-)
Werner
Re: Feature request, Mats Bengtsson, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Xavier Scheuer, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24