[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc/LSR-problem?
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Doc/LSR-problem? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:20:05 +0200 |
Am 30. März 2012 21:32 schrieb Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
>
> I just downloaded today's tarball: lsr-snippets-all-2012-03-30.tar.gz
> in order to make some checks.
>
> Something went wrong:
>
> In the updated files the old version and the old header is not
> replaced by the new ones.
> Instead the new versions/headers were simply added.
[...]
> I just informed Sebastiano.
>
Sebastiano answered:
Am 31. März 2012 02:45 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna <address@hidden>:
> On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
>> \version "2.12.2"
>
> This was easy: there is a field Constants.VERSION that had to be updated.
>
>> doctitle = "Adding fingerings to chords"
>> }
>> \version "2.14.0"
>>
>> \header {
>> texidoc = "
>> Fingerings for chords can be obtained by adding them to individual
>> pitches.
>
>
> That's instead entirely different. The snippets for updating are assumed to
> contain exactly the snippets--nothing else. The header is added automatically.
>
> Now the header is build into the snippets, which will cause the header to be
> added twice.
>
> I suggest that you contact the manual maintainer and let them know that they
> MUST clarify the updating procedure in the manual: only the actual Lilypond
> code should be contained in the snippet--and nothing else.
>
> Ciao,
>
> seba
>
>
Well, I could suggest some changes to the CG.
If there's need to delete all the versions and headers from all files
of the updated lsr-tarball before sending it back to Sebastiano, then
a shell-script to do so should be created. But that's beyond my
knowledge.
-Harm
- Doc/LSR-problem?, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/30
- Re: Doc/LSR-problem?,
Thomas Morley <=