[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR is now on 2.14
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: LSR is now on 2.14 |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:22:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:57:37AM +0100, James wrote:
> I've updated LilyDev and been working with it this week testing the
> basics - it makes the code and the doc. I've given Mike a copy of the
> iso (as he was the only one I knew who used LilyDev in anger)
actually, all official lilypond releases are built with GUB. :)
(running as a standalone installation, not inside virtualbox)
> As far as I know, this is good to go.
If you send me a link, I'll try it out because my phd dissertation
has completely unravelled into not even being able to produce a
pluck and I could really use something simple to work on.
> but if you
> ever wanted to make the whole doc you'd need more and 1 CPU with small
> amounts of RAM would take a while to compile all the doc. For LSR you
> don't need this, obviously.
If you're just doing a normal update from LSR, then no you don't
need it. But if somebody is going to be deleting the now-unneeded
snippets (absolutely highly recommended, and I may even make that
a Critical issue), they'll need to compile the docs to check that
they haven't typo'd something.
- Graham
- LSR is now on 2.14, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/29
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Graham Percival, 2012/03/29
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/29
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Graham Percival, 2012/03/29
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, James, 2012/03/30
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/31
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, James, 2012/03/31