[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vertical spacing - skyline integrals
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: vertical spacing - skyline integrals |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:05:06 +0100 |
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> Looks right: The area between horizontal skylines should influence the
>>> spacing. However, I think we need a parameter to adjust the amount of
>>> influence.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> I mean that some people probably want a more rigid spacing, only
> slightly influenced by the area inbetween. This is a matter of taste
>
> [...] I would like to have an additional parameter, say,
>
> system-system-spacing #'rigidity = X
>
> where X is a number between 0 and 1. Value 1 essentially means no
> skyline integrals, while value 0 exactly the opposite.
Maybe. We'll see when there is some working code.
I'd like to have as few parameters as possible, to make things simpler
(within reason).
>> I've identified two potential problems that may appear, and ideas
>> for solutions:
>>
>> www.anonstorage.net/PStorage/621.skyline-integrals-teeth-marked.pdf
>> www.anonstorage.net/PStorage/328.integrals-pitfall-two-marked.pdf
>
> A possible solution is to `dampen' the skyline for the area
> computation, this is, to apply the beam logic to the skyline. For
> example, this
>
> ----------
> |
> |
> |
> |
> -----------------------------
>
> becomes this:
>
> ---------
> \
> \
> \
> \
> ------------
That's what i meant (for the first problem).
thanks,
Janek