[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plans for changing chord repeat implementations
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: Plans for changing chord repeat implementations |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:09:17 +0100 |
Le 26 janv. 2012 à 11:00, David Kastrup a écrit :
> The bad news is that absolute pitch friends would have to call the \q
> function (any better name for it?) explicitly. Since q is an input
> convenience, and relative pitch is also an input convenience, I don't
> think that there would be much of an affected user base.
I do use absolute pitch mode, together with the q shortcut, so the
affected user base is non-nil. \relative is to save characters, but `q'
is more than that, it also improves to maintain and read code, so it's
not surprising to see absolute mode and `q' together. Here is a real
word example copied from my code base:
{
R2. |
<sol' do'' mi''>8-"pincé" q q q q q |
q q q q q q |
q <sol re' si' fa''> q q <sol re' re'' si''> q |
q <sol re' si' fa''> q q <sol re' re'' si''> q |
q4 r2 |
r8 <sol re' si' fa''> q q q q |
<sol' do'' mi''>8 q q q <sol re' do''>4 <sol fa' si'> |
<sol mi' do''>4 r2 |
<sol' do'' mi''>8 q q q q q |
q q q q q q |
r2 <la' mi''>4 |
<fa' mi''>8 q q q q q |
q q q q r4 |
}
What would be the impact of your solution on this kind of code?
Is it just about adding e.g. \q before the block?
Nicolas
Re: Plans for changing chord repeat implementations, David Kastrup, 2012/01/28