[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062) |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:54:33 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:12:49PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> Yes, but I wouldn't leave it in that state. The full set of commands is
>
> git rebase origin/staging dev/cg~0
> git push origin HEAD:staging
> git checkout dev/cg
LGTM
> At this point, you have pushed dev/cg to staging without polluting
> dev/cg with staging. And you can continue to rebase dev/cg with master
> as needed/desired. You never have to worry about accidentally putting
> some reverted commit back into staging. It's completely foolproof.
+1
> The examples for the guide are intended to be copy and pastable, not
> necessarily to teach how to use git in general. Working commands that
> do what we want should be preferred to commands that require a developer
> to follow through some steps and make it right.
+10
- Graham
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), (continued)
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), dak, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), dak, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), dak, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062),
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/15
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), dak, 2012/01/16
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2012/01/16
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), dak, 2012/01/16
- Re: Issue 2100: Explanation of branches for CG (issue 5539062), janek . lilypond, 2012/01/17