[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR 2.1 Vocal music
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: NR 2.1 Vocal music |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:48:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, August 27, 2010 9:54 PM
>
> >I know you didn't say to look at NR 2.1.1, but I noticed that you
> >used
> >"Common references for vocal music" instead of the standard
> >"References for vocal music".
>
> Yes, this was because there are specific references later.
> But I don't feel too strongly about this if you'd really
> rather it conform.
I'd rather make it conform; later ones can simply be "References
for hymns" and the like.
> >I'd
> >actually say that 2.1.2 is the only subsection which is common to
> >"all" types of vocal music.
>
> I think we need to reorganise the first few sections
> of Vocal a little.
>
> I suggest the following:
>
> 2.1 Vocal music
> 2.1.1 Common notation for vocal music
> (Common) references for vocal music
> Entering lyrics (the present Lyrics explained)
> [all the sections in Aligning lyrics to a melody
> except for Lyrics and repeats]
> 2.1.2 Techniques specific to lyrics
> [as now, plus:]
> Working with lyrics and variables
> Lyrics and repeats
I like it. You have slightly more inside 2.1.1 than I would have
initially guessed, but I've always proclaimed my ignorance of
lyrics. If you're content with that change, then I'm happy.
> And it removes the problem
> of referencing sections by number.
That's my biggest concern, so it seems like everything (will be)
in order.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: NR 2.1 Vocal music, (continued)
Re: NR 2.1 Vocal music, Trevor Daniels, 2010/08/26