[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt
From: |
Joseph Wakeling |
Subject: |
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:56:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Hans Aberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>> RMS says he thinks it is better using artificial examples, not risking a
>> lawsuit when it is so easy to avoid and still have good results.
>
> 1) I don't care what RMS says.
Though in this case his comment is apt, and provides a good
justification for your points (2) and (3) :-)
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, (continued)
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Arthur Reutenauer, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, David Kastrup, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt,
Joseph Wakeling <=