lilypond-devel
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
OSX 10.5+
From
:
James Bailey
Subject
:
OSX 10.5+
Date
:
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:31:37 +0100
As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with
lilypond on 10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the
issue was just raised on the -user list. Would it be useful now to
simply have the PPC/Intel binaries (labeled as such)?
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
OSX 10.5+
,
James Bailey
<=
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
Graham Percival
,
2010/02/22
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
James Bailey
,
2010/02/23
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
Patrick McCarty
,
2010/02/23
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
James Bailey
,
2010/02/23
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
Patrick McCarty
,
2010/02/23
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
James Bailey
,
2010/02/23
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
Patrick McCarty
,
2010/02/23
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
James Bailey
,
2010/02/24
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
Patrick McCarty
,
2010/02/24
Re: OSX 10.5+
,
James Bailey
,
2010/02/23
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH] Support scheme0-scheme1-scheme2-scheme3 argument pattern for markup commands.
Next by Date:
Re: Missing fetaNumber/Dynamic glyphs following fontconfig changes
Previous by thread:
Re: Fix #943 (input/regression/slur-broken-trend.ly broken) (issue203054)
Next by thread:
Re: OSX 10.5+
Index(es):
Date
Thread