[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Priority-Regression policy
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Priority-Regression policy |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:39:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
What's the feeling amongst developers about what should be ranked
as priority-Regression (and thus stop a release) ? In particular,
should *everything* that used to work -- even if it was by
accident? -- be ranked a Regression?
For example,
- markup \note in time signature: worked in 2.10, currently
Defect-Low.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628
- Tie direction: worked in 2.10 (by accident?), currently
Enhancement-Low.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=592
I don't particularly mind which way we decide, but I'd like it to
be consistent, and I'm going to insist that if something is
Priority-Regression, it blocks a release.
Opinions are only sought from actual developers (i.e. the people
who will be fixing such bugs). If you're an interested user or
new contributor, then although I would generally encourage you to
join the discussion, please don't get involved in this one.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Priority-Regression policy,
Graham Percival <=