Re: Change of line-width in docs

[Trevor Daniels]

Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 12, 2009 12:20 PM


> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > Graham Percival wrote Saturday, September 12, 2009 12:00 AM
> > > It was not deliberate to change the docs lnie-width.
> >
> > I that case I'd like to change it back.
>
> No argument here.  :)
>
> > It appears to be a side effect of some other change to 
> > lilypond-book,
> > which I suspect now picks up 'smallbook' rather than 'A4' for ly
> > fragments.
> >
> > I'll try to track it down when I have a bit
> > more time to do a binary search, unless someone
> > else has a idea what might have caused this.

It -is- due to lilypond-book using its default
value, which is 'smallbook', but this is not due
to a change in lilypond-book itself, as very old
versions of lilypond-book (c 2008) behave the same
way, whereas all the docs on lilypond.org (June 2009)
are fine.

> It might have been me moving @afourpaper into a shared macro for
> texinfo.

Is lilypond-book affected by the macro expansions?

> > In the meantime I'll add line-width to the @lilypond command for 
> > the
> > broken fragment in LM 5.4.3 with a comment.
>
> No; please don't.  It doesn't matter if it looks bad in a -devel
> release, and this will force us to fix the underlying issue.

OK, I'll wait until this is resolved.

Trevor