[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions"
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions" |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:41:41 -0700 |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Patrick McCarty<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Mark Polesky<address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> 0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in
>> define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to
>> the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it altogether?
>
> All of the IR 4 functions are auto-generated from C++ code (search for
> LY_DEFINE in the source).
...and IMPLEMENT_TYPE_P, as you'll see in the patch.
-Patrick