Re: Autobeaming restructuring

[Hans Aberg]

On 24 Jun 2009, at 15:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:

> About 10 weeks ago I proposed a new architecture for autobeaming  
> rules,
> which placed all the rules in a single nested alist, with one entry  
> per time
> signature.

To me that sounds as though the time signature selects the meter,  
which barely works in CPP. For more complex meters, one in effect does  
the other way around: one selects a meter, and then sums it up fully  
to to some degree to get the time signature.

If that is not within the scope of the current changes, then so it may  
be. But the current model is a bit too complicated.

  Hans