Re: define-grobs.scm properties not alphabetical

[Mark Polesky]

Patrick McCarty wrote:
> IIUC, every grob is self-contained, so it shouldn't matter which order
> they are in.  Maybe in the past someone wanted to group "related"
> grobs together (like the internal grob property list), thus the
> comment.
> 
> Alphabetical order makes the most sense to me in this case, with the grob 
> alist.

with one exception mentioned on line 11:
;;;; WARNING: the meta field should be the last one.

- Mark