lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: should we provide an empty stencil?


From: Gilles THIBAULT
Subject: Re: should we provide an empty stencil?
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:51:52 +0200


Since setting a grob's stencil prop to #f can trigger errors, I
discovered the following workaround. Do we have anything like this
already?
Yes.
empty-stencil is already defined in "define-markup-commands.scm", by :

(define-public empty-stencil (ly:make-stencil '() '(1 . -1) '(1 . -1)))

Well, I cannot tell you the advantages and drawbacks of this version versus your proposal...

Gilles





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]