[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidental-restructuring (major)
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Accidental-restructuring (major) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:07:48 -0300 |
2007/9/17, Rune Zedeler <address@hidden>:
> where make-default-accidental-rule makes a four argument scheme-function
> - taking a localKeySignature, a pitch, a bar_number and a
> measure_position - and returning what check_pitch_against_signature
> currently returns.
>
> I think I should be able to do these changes as soon as I get the green
> light.
Since you wrote the previous incarnation of the code, I'm pretty much
ok with what you think is best, as long as the canonical way of
setting accidentals remains functional.
I have another request though. If you are going to rewrite the thing,
can you think of a representation which is less fragile than the
arcane nesting of lists? Perhaps you can capture some part of the
rules in either smobs or Scheme records.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen