Re: GDP: rearrangement

[Rune Zedeler]

Valentin Villenave skrev:

> Why does "decorating" have a negative meaning to everyone but me?
> Your suggestions are fine too, though.

The problems are
- even though the term makes sense, it is quite difficult to uniquely 
determine whether a specific feature is "decorating"
- Separating decorating stuff from non-decorating stuff moves closely 
related items away from each other. E.g. automatic accidentals are 
non-decorating whereas cautional accidentals are decorating. Ties are 
non-decorating whereas slurs are decorating. Moving these sections away 
from each other will make the manual very difficult to use.

-Rune