Re: Questions regarding creation of a new glyph

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Maximilian Albert escreveu:
> Concerning the naming of the new black diamond glyph I decided to stick
> with "s2harmonic" for the time being because it underlines the
> parallelism to neomensural and the other styles where the black notehead
> is called "s2neomensural", etc. To further keep up this similarity I
> also added a glyph called "s1harmonic" which is entirely identical to
> the open diamond but in a way "closes the gap" between "s0" and "s2"
> (although it is used nowhere at all). IMHO this provides some sort of
> consistency in the naming. Agree?

No, this should be handled by the code in output-lib. That code's sole purpose
is to fill all the gaps in the different styles.

> the compilation process of lilypond (thus indirectly influencing the
> viewing of pdf files). How does it do this?

the command

mftrace --simplify 

uses ff.

I'd like to integrate your patch. However, could you post a patch made with
GIT to the list, so I can apply without having to invent a commit  message
and C&P-ing your name & email? 

thanks. 

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com