Re: Merging different fonts

[Douglas A Linhardt]

Han-Wen,

On 3/15/2004 12:20 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> 
>>>necessary? If not, then we can skip that option, and simply never
>>>merge if styles are different.
>>
>>I considered that, but I saw the pattern for different heads and
>>different dottings.  Not having much choral experience (where I
>>suspect this comes into play), I don't see a lot of reason for those
>>properties, either, but lilypond provides them.  So I figured I'd
>>also provide a mechanism for the existing behavior as part of my
>>fix.  I was just trying to leave as much flexibility in
> 
> 
> The other properties reflect some guitar and piano practices.  I don't
> see use of a merge-different-style, so please leave it out for now. We
> can always put it back in later.
>

No problem.  Thanks for the feedback.

> 
>>function, and used it for my patch, too.
>>
>>I have been playing around the last couple of weeks with the autochange 
>>function
>>(also for use with handbells - expect a patch in a couple of days), and I've
>>been learning quite a bit about object and context properties.  I now would 
>>use
>>the property directly, but I didn't realize how it all fit together when I 
>>wrote
>>this patch.
> 
> 
> I haven't integrated your previous patch due to the questions I
> had. Could you (re)implement the functionality as you would do it now,
> and send me the patch, so I can apply it to the CVS repo?  Thanks!
> 
>

I should be able to do it tonight.  I'll get it to you as soon as it's done.

Doug