[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: double info docs and fonts
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: double info docs and fonts |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:57:57 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > address@hidden writes:
> >
> >> now we have a conventional (out/*, image alt only) and www
> >> (out-www/*, image src present) Info documentation. Should
> >> the files of the latter override those of the former when
> >> installed?
> >
> > Yes. If possible - the idea is that the lilypond package
> > has the info files without .png, and lilypond-doc has the
> > PNGs for those info files.
>
> And the replacement info files which reference those PNGs, I
> guess.
No, our idea was to have the info files that reference the PNGs be
distributed with the base package.
(or I'm mistaken. Jan?)
> >> Analogously, we also have *.pfa fonts in mf/out and
> >> mf/out-www, which are mostly the same. What's the role
> >> of this?
> >
> > That's strange, out-www/ shouldn't contain pfa files. Can you
> > investigate how they ended up there?
>
> To be honest I'm pretty much lost with the stepmake build
> system. I will try my best, but some guidance would be most
> welcome.
Just redirect the output of the build process into a log file, and see
where it says out-www/*.pfa
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen