[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: procedures with setters: patches
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: procedures with setters: patches |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:36:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:57:00 +0100, Jan a dit :
> Doing style fixes separately requires quite a bit of dicipline and
> means extra work (resolving conflicts). It makes little sense to
> 'just remember' the files that need style fixes, and fix them in
> another CVS tree: then it feels more like a LilyPond janitor job, and
> looking at it that way: why not clean-up another file? How about a
> starting small scale janitor project?
If I'am brave enough, I will clean-up the scm files that nettle me
when reading them.
>> Should indentation be tabified, or untabified (I refer to the emacs
>> commands)? This time, I have done a C-x h M-x tabify, but in previous
>> patches, they were untabified.
> I don't think we have a policy for this. What do you suggest.
I prefer spaces but it's an unrational feeling.
tabs don't look always the same depending on the editor settings.
nicolas